Dimension 5 of 10 · methodology v1.0

Transparency & disclosure

Does the vendor show its work — publish methodology, cite third parties, and state its own limitations?

Dimension
5 of 10
Requirements
6
Conformance gate
No
Applies to
All categories
References
0
Methodology
v1.0
In full

Requirements, evidence source, and references

This page is the citable form of this dimension — a finding elsewhere can link straight to the bar it was judged against.

05

Transparency & disclosure

6 requirements

Does the vendor show its work — publish methodology, cite third parties, and state its own limitations?

Requirements · 6
  • Performance claims are accompanied by actual numbers rather than adjectives.

    • "Minimal impact", "negligible overhead" and similar phrasing, with no figure attached, scores as no claim at all.

  • Third-party or independent validation is cited, and the citation is not circular — a source that itself cites the vendor does not count.

  • Test conditions behind any published figure are stated: hardware, software versions, iteration counts, and what was being measured.

  • Known limitations are disclosed by the vendor rather than found by a reviewer.

  • Technical claims are attributed to named people rather than to the company in the abstract.

  • A reader with the same hardware could in principle reproduce the vendor's published figure from what is published.

Evidence sourcePublic claims audit — reading the vendor's own published documentation, case studies and whitepapers.
Take the whole bar
Download .md
The ratings are not published yet

The criteria are public so you can judge the bar before anyone is measured against it.

If you are choosing between post-quantum suppliers, or you are one and want to know how you will be assessed, get in touch. We will tell you when there are results to read.

A vendor in the pool, or think you should be? Cooperation gets you advance notice of the criteria and a pre-publication window to correct factual errors. It does not buy a better result.