Dimension 4 of 10 · methodology v1.0

Crypto-agility

Can a customer change algorithms later without re-architecting — the question every regulator is converging on?

Dimension
4 of 10
Requirements
6
Conformance gate
No
Applies to
All categories
References
3
Methodology
v1.0
In full

Requirements, evidence source, and references

This page is the citable form of this dimension — a finding elsewhere can link straight to the bar it was judged against.

04

Crypto-agility

6 requirements

Can a customer change algorithms later without re-architecting — the question every regulator is converging on?

Requirements · 6
  • Algorithms are selectable through configuration rather than compiled in.

  • More than one algorithm family is supported for the same function, so a break in one is survivable.

    • Lattice and hash-based signatures both available, rather than a single lattice bet.

    • For KEMs, whether anything other than ML-KEM is offered.

  • A documented path exists for replacing an algorithm after deployment, including what happens to data already protected.

  • Hybrid and classical-only modes can both be expressed, since jurisdictions differ on which is required.

  • Cryptographic inventory or bill-of-materials output is available in a machine-readable form.

  • Algorithm changes are deliverable as a firmware update to devices already in the field.

    HSM
Evidence sourcePublic documentation.
References
Scoping applies on this dimensionSome requirements here apply only to certain kinds of vendor. A requirement that is out of scope for a vendor is not assessed for that vendor — it is never scored as a failure, and never counted in the denominator.
Take the whole bar
Download .md
The ratings are not published yet

The criteria are public so you can judge the bar before anyone is measured against it.

If you are choosing between post-quantum suppliers, or you are one and want to know how you will be assessed, get in touch. We will tell you when there are results to read.

A vendor in the pool, or think you should be? Cooperation gets you advance notice of the criteria and a pre-publication window to correct factual errors. It does not buy a better result.